000			01921nas a2200217Ia 4500
008			240802c99999999xx |||||||||||| ||und||
022			_a0042-0980
100			_aHodson, Mike _9119799
245		0	_aHow have digital mobility platforms responded to COVID-19 and why does this matter for the urban?
260			_bUrban Studies
260			_c2024
300			_a923-942
520			_aDigital mobility platforms have become increasingly pervasive over the last decade or so in a wide variety of urban contexts. Much digital mobility platform activity has focused on city centres and urban cores, where returns on investment are often seen to be greatest, where existing transport infrastructure can be thick and where there are concentrated circulations of people. The global spread of coronavirus from early 2020 resulted in widespread policies of social distancing and lockdowns. Though there was a geographical unevenness to such policies, COVID-19 saw dramatic reductions in urban public transport provision and use, and new forms of experimentation with urban infrastructures, including with digital mobility platforms. How digital mobility platforms have responded to COVID-19 is not clearly understood and requires systematic research engagement. To address this we ask: how have digital mobility platforms responded to COVID-19 and what are the implications of this for the urban'? We develop a stylised understanding of six digital platform responses to COVID-19. The status of these six responses is that they are synthetic and propositional and need to be systematically tested in a variety of actually existing urban contexts.
650			_a Infrastructure _971391
650			_a Technology/Smart Cities _9119800
650			_a Transport _910821
650			_aGovernance
700			_a Lockhart, Andy _9119801
700			_a McMeekin, Andrew _9119802
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231194891
999			_c133551 _d133551