000 | 01345nam a2200241Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 240826s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| | ||
022 | _a0042-0980 | ||
100 |
_a McFarlane, Colin _9120825 |
||
100 |
_a Tripathy, Priyam _9120826 |
||
100 | _a2024 | ||
100 |
_aChen, Hung-Ying _9120827 |
||
245 | 0 | _aDensity and pandemic urbanism: Exposure and networked density in Manila and Taipei | |
260 | _bUrban Studies | ||
260 | _c2024 | ||
300 | _a1526-1544 | ||
520 | _aDensity has been a key focus in research on the urban dimensions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of this work has debated the role of density in infection rates. In contrast, we develop a comparison of the management of pandemic urbanism in two high density Asian cities with divergent pandemic experiences: Manila and Taipei. To pursue the comparison, we develop two conceptualisations of density: exposure density and networked density. Our approach allows us to examine the nature and consequences, especially for the urban poor, of different approaches to density in the pandemic, and to advance research on urban density. | ||
650 |
_a Exposure Risk _9120828 |
||
650 |
_a Manila _9120829 |
||
650 |
_a Network Topology _9120830 |
||
650 |
_a Pandemic Urbanism _9120831 |
||
650 |
_aDensity _9119438 |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231211011 | ||
999 |
_c133794 _d133794 |